Some Interesting Points:
Some individuals suggest that Adam
P. Lanza did not actually exist which of course merely an opinion if one fails
to
conduct proper research. To determine if Adam Lanza existed, one should check
primary sources. In this case, one would check for a birth record, social
security record, school records, census records (latest publicly released is
1940), medical and dental records and a death record. Additionally, eyewitness
accounts from people who interacted with Adam P. Lanza could substantiate the
primary source evidence.
Ryan Kraft, a neighbor babysat Adam about ten years ago and
noticed “some unusual behavior from the boy.” Kraft, a former student at Sandy
Hook, said, “When I had put him to bed early or stopped doing something, he
would be really unhappy about it and throw a tantrum in a way that a younger kid
I would normally expect to behave.” Kraft said, “Adam always struck me as a
really introverted kid. He was really quiet and whenever we were doing something
whether he was building Leggos or playing video games he was really focused on
it, like he was in his own world.”
[1]
Neighbor says Lanza was on meds, links between SSRIs and
violence
http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/339440
Voter’s Records
Name:
Ryan J. Lanza (4 years older than Adam)
Birth Date:
10 Apr
Address:
36 Yogananda St, Sandy Hook, CT, 06482-1569
[2]
The police questioned Ryan Lanza who told police that he
hadn't spoken to him in more than a year. When they asked him why, Ryan said
Adam is “sick” and “doesn’t talk to anyone.” They then asked, “Do you have any
idea why he did this?” Ryan responded: “No. I don't know him anymore.”
[3]
Given Nancy Lanza’s documented devotion to obtaining mental
health services for Adam, it seems bizarre that the Connecticut State Police
(CSP) report fails to
provide information about the last five years of Lanza's mental health records. In light
of the article dated June 30, 2013 by The
Hartford Currant, stating that the paper had access to Lanza’s medical
records from birth to age 18, it becomes more curious that the official CSP report would fail to make these records public.
[4]
On August 22, 2013, Connecticut Assistant Attorney General,
Patrick B. Kwanashie, during a freedom of information hearing on this matter,
stated that releasing this information could “… cause a lot of people to stop
taking their medications.” Mr. Kwanashie has been a lawyer in Connecticut since
1988, and receives an annual salary of $142,000. It is very significant that he
denied a freedom of information request. The Lanza shooting is probably the
highest profile case that Connecticut has experienced in decades. Obviously, it
is a credible indication that Adam Lanza was taking a psychiatric medication
around the time of the shootings. However, the State of Connecticut will not
release this information because it “might induce large numbers of people to
stop taking antidepressants.”
[5]
We gain
the following from Cass R. Sunstein and Adrian Vermeule regarding the
infiltration of agents or their allies. “However, our main policy idea is that
government should engage in cognitive infiltration of the groups that produce
conspiracy theories, which involves a combination of the following: (1)
Government might itself engage in counter-speech, marshaling arguments to
discredit conspiracy theories. (2) Government might formally hire credible
private parties to engage in counter-speech. (3) Government might engage in
informal communication with such parties, encouraging them to help.”
[6]
Infiltrators should focus on the “third-party mass audience,” by using arguments
and rhetoric repeatedly to reinforce it. We mean that government efforts might
succeed in weakening or even breaking up the ideological groups. “Hearing only
conspiratorial accounts of government behavior, their members become ever more
prone to believe and generate such accounts.” To polarize a group, we suggest
that the reversal of views by the introduction of other
ideas. “Government agents (and their allies) might enter chat rooms,
online social networks, or even real-space groups and attempt to undermine
percolating conspiracy theories by raising doubts about their factual premises,
causal logic or implications for political action.”
[7]
If the government can dispel such theories, it should do
so. One problem is that its efforts might be counter-productive, because efforts
to rebut conspiracy theories might also legitimize them. This is certailn the
case with Jim Fetzer's Amazon-banned book: Nobody Died at Sandy Hook. We have suggested,
however, that government can minimize this effect by rebutting more rather than
fewer theories. Infiltrators should supply rebuttals designed to marginalize
conspiracies.
[8]
A few people who have an Internet presence have made some
interesting claims regarding the shootings at the Sandy Hook Elementary School
such as the following,
1.
Proof
of death has been suppressed: 27 children and adults, including Adam Lanza, at
the school, and his mother, Nancy Lanza, in her home
Anyone may o
Some researchers have stated that Adam Lanza, according to
the Social Security Death Index (SSDI), died the day before, on December 13,
2012. Presumably, those researchers consider the SSDI as a valid source, which
it is. Yet, when I went to the SSDI, via my subscription on Ancestry, I found
that Adam Lanza died on December 14, which was also corroborated by three
obituary and burial indexes. I do not know the real source of the other
researcher’s information as it is not cited. It is just an image with what
appears to be a recent photo on a card. Adam’s social security number (SSN) was
issued in 1992 so I question the recent image in conjunction with a number that
was issued in 1992.
Name: Adam P Lanza
Born: 22 Apr 1992
Died: 14 Dec 2012
State (Year) SSN issued: New Hampshire (1992)
[9]
Name: Nancy Lanza
Born: 6 Sep 1960
Died: 14 Dec 2012
State (Year) SSN issued: New Hampshire
2.
Emergency protocols were not followed – absence of blood outside
There are photos of blood outside of the school. “There is no evidence of any frantic effort to save lives
or to remove bodies to hospitals; instead the scene outside the school looked
calm and largely bloodless—with police and other personnel milling around
casually and a severe shortage of dead or injured victims.”
[10] Kelly from Tulsa referred to an expired legislative act that dealt with medical waste to
try to prove that the investigators had a legal responsibility to track the
clean-up, presumably the blood evidence from the victims of Sandy Hook, all the
way to the incinerator with names and dates. Yet on the linked web site, giving
the particulars of the
CT
Medical Waste Tracking Act of 1988, it indicates that this was a two-year
program that took effect on June 24, 1989 and expired
on June 21, 1991. Officials implemented it in four states, New York, New
Jersey, Connecticut, and Rhode Island and in Puerto Rico.
3.
Drill
protocols were followed instead
One such plan available on the web is
“Operation Closed Campus,” initially from Infowars, was developed by
Iowa
officials
following guidance set forth by the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation
Program (HSEEP) of the US Department of Homeland Security, published on March
21, 2011. In the 41-page document, it mentions that there had been a couple of
threats over a period of three months because of the huge influx of poor
minorities into the more affordable rural communities, presumably from two
teenaged anti-immigration suspects, Timothy Jasper and John Jackson, which
prompted the county to develop a program to address any potential assaults. One
note said, “If you won’t get rid of them, we will.” Officials created a 2-hour
exercise scheduled at Treynor Middle/Senior High School, for March 26, 2011
beginning at 9 am. “All communications, spoken or written, will begin and end
with the statement,
this is an exercise.”
[11] There was substantial paperwork and a
follow-up conference for the operation in Iowa. During the exercise,
participants were not to demonstrate any aggressive behavior or
carry loaded
guns under any circumstances. No one was killed!
A
Veteran’s Today article states: “According to protocol, everyone at the
drill must check in, identification badges are
issued to personnel and observers, and drinking water and restrooms are
available. Personnel include the director, staff, controllers, evaluators,
actors, media personnel and ‘players’ (agency
employees) both in uniforms and civilian clothes.
This protocol
appears to have been followed at Sandy Hook, where many participants
wore ID/identification badges on lanyards, a huge check-in sign is visible and
even Porta Potties are at the ready.” The electronic sign,
Everyone Must
Check in, displayed in the article was taken at the Sandy Hook
Firehouse, the staging area for the incident. That sign was NOT there until
12/15. Some hoaxers claim that FEMA conducted a drill at Sandy Hook usung a FEMA
manual which was actually created by hoaxer, Tony Mead using a MS Word document
from the state of Massachusetts. Just because
there were individuals photographed later in the day at Sandy Hook who wore badges does not mean that there
was an exercise. Many employees in all communities are required to wear badges.
The article states that there was a school shooting drill in Bridgeport, 19 to
20 miles from Newtown, on December 14, 2012, from 9 AM to 4 PM/ET. It was
actually an all-day class conducted by the Connecticut Department of Emergency
Services and Public Protection Emergency Management and Homeland Security,
entitled
“Planning for the Needs of Children in Disasters.”
The article also says, “The Sandy Hook
“shooting”
appears to have been an Integrated
Capstone Event (ICE), an exercise run by FEMA to coordinate federal, state and
local emergency response teams in the case of a mass-casualty event. As such, it
would have utilized actors and media partners to simulate a tragedy in order to
train participants, and also in order to observe the reaction of the citizenry.”
All
Capstone Events are conducted in Anniston, Alabama under the direction of
the Center for Domestic Preparedness (CDP) and funded by
the Department of Homeland Security.
4.
There
was foreknowledge of the event
One researcher calls attention to the idea that web sites
were created memorializing the victims before the event occurred. A mistake that
many people make is due to their lack of understanding on reconfigured domains
and IP addresses. I wrote an article on September 29, 2005 where I indicated
that Bill Clinton and George H. W. Bush created a web site to raise funds for
the victims of Hurricane Katrina which hit southeast Louisiana the morning of
August 29, 2005. However, I did a search on the origination date of the site
through WHOSIS and the Bush/Clinton web site had a creation date of June 14,
2005. This seemed to indicate that Bush and Clinton had foreknowledge. Terry
Melanson explained how this occurs. IP addresses and domains names are two
completely different things. When someone creates a domain name, he/she has to
set up a DNS record for that domain to reside on an already existing IP address.
An IP address is only a unique identifier for a computer that is connected to
the internet. In the case of the Bush/Clinton Katrina Fund web site, they
assigned the domain to a computer (server) that had been registered in 1988 for
its particular IP address. Therefore, when I inquired through WHOIS, someone
said, “Regarding your inquiry, the information reflected on the 'data as of'
field is actually the last updated information for the IP address connected to
that domain name.” That was accurate. That IP address was assigned to the
“newly-created” domain name was refreshed with its info on that particular date.
The only real info that needs to be considered when looking at domain names is
the domain's creation date, which is was September 2, 2005. Domain names are
registered and attached to an IP address of an existing computer server. This
may also occur when someone reconfigures a web site or a domain to devote it to
another issue. I created my first web site in the mid-1990s devoted to an
activity that I was involved with at that time. I reconfigured the site a few
years ago to reflect my current activities.
5.
There
were contradictory reports about the weapons
Misreporting is very common especially in the confusion of
a mass shooting. This occurred at Columbine and it occurs in every such event. Eyewitness reports are not as valid as other evidence in any
criminal court cases. The Supreme Court has called eyewitness testimony
“notoriously unreliable” while the Innocence Project says that “eyewitness
misidentification is the single greatest cause of wrongful convictions.” Yet,
many people promote the idea that a few media interviews with people who were
there is more significant than evidence reported by the police.
“In January 2013, Connecticut state police released a
statement indicating that they had found four guns inside the school: a
Bushmaster .223 caliber XM 15-E2S semi-automatic rifle with high capacity 30
round clips, a Glock 10-mm handgun and a Sig-Sauer P226 9mm handgun. They said
they also found an Izhmash Canta-12 12-gauge shotgun in Lanza’s car (NBC).”
[12]
“This shotgun is also shown in a video aired on the night
of 14 December 2013, by NBC. An
evidence collection team and a policeman find the gun in the trunk of Lanza’s
Honda Civic—the policeman handles the gun without gloves and ejects the
ammunition on the spot. Some have seen two long guns in the trunk in the NBC
video: the 12-gauge shotgun and the Bushmaster rifle.”
[13]
6.
Adam
Lanza cannot have done the shooting
Alleged shooter Adam Lanza used a Bushmaster AR-15 assault
rifle as his primary weapon. The gun that the police removed from the Lanza’s
trunk was a rifle that was not used in the shootings. “As Mike Powers,
(aka Mike Hollingsworth) a professional military investigator and ballistics
expert, has observed, this young man of slight build could not have carried all
these heavy, bulky weapons and ammunition on his person. Furthermore, since
first responders were supposedly inside the school within seven minutes, there
was not enough time for Lanza to have carried out the shooting as reported. In
an interview with Joyce Riley,
Powers states that Lanza could not have fired so many times continuously without
destabilizing himself from the intense noise from the Bushmaster.
As a novice, he could not have shot
an AR-15 with such speed and accuracy, supposedly changing magazines 8-10 times
without a stoppage.”
[15]
7.
Key
participants displayed inappropriate behavior
“There are many bizarre media reports and interviews of
those associated with the “shooting.” Some examples: Wayne Carver—Medical
Examiner Wayne Carver’s surreal press conference is one of the most startling of
all the media offerings. Widely available on YouTube, this event shows H. Wayne
Carver II, a public official of some standing, clowning and acting
outlandish—grinning strangely, making irrelevant comments, and basically
appearing unknowledgeable and unprofessional.”
[16]
8.
Photos at scene and of victims look staged or fake
9.
The
crime scene was completely destroyed
10.
Deceased children sang at the Super Bowl
[18]
Seriously, if people were going to try to pull off a
conspiracy would they really allow deceased children to sing at the Super Bowl?
[1] David Boroff, Adam Lanza’s
babysitter Ryan Kraft stunned by mass murder at Sandy Hook Elementary
School, New York Daily News, December 17, 2012,
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/adam-lanza-babysitter-stunned-sandy-hook-tragedy-article-1.1221855,
accessed 1/19/2014
Read more:
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/adam-lanza-babysitter-stunned-sandy-hook-tragedy-article-1.1221855#ixzz2qtLP8QfJ
[2] Ancestry.com. U.S. Public Records
Index, Volume 2 (database on-line), Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com
Operations, Inc., 2010,
Original data: Voter Registration Lists, Public Record Filings,
Historical Residential Records, and Other Household Database Listings
[3] Pamela Engel, New Details
Revealed About Ryan Lanza's Interrogation After The Sandy Hook Massacre,
December 7, 2013,
http://www.businessinsider.com/ryan-lanzas-interrogation-in-matthew-lysiak-book-2013-12,
accessed 1/19/2014
[4] Sheila Matthews, The Sandy Hook
Investigation and the “YALE Folder,” January 4th, 2014,
http://ablechild.org/2014/01/04/the-sandy-hook-investigation-and-the-yale-folder/;
accessed 1/13/2014
[5] Phil Hickey, Ph.D., Sandy Hook
Massacre: The Unanswered Question, January 6, 2014,
http://www.cchrint.org/2014/01/07/sandy-hook-massacre-the-unanswered-question,
accessed 1/14/2014
[6] Cass R. Sunstein, Adrian Vermeule,
Conspiracy Theories, 1/15/08,
pp. 14-16
[7] Cass R. Sunstein, Adrian Vermeule,
Conspiracy Theories, 1/15/08,
pp. 22-23
[8] Cass R. Sunstein, Adrian Vermeule,
Conspiracy Theories, 1/15/08,
p. 30
[9] Source Information: Ancestry.com,
U.S., Social Security Death Index, 1935-Current (database on-line)
Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2011, Original data: Social
Security Administration, Social Security Death Index, Master File.
Social Security Administration,
[10] Vivian Lee, Sofia Smallstorm,
James Tracy, Jim Fetzer and the Sandy Hook Research Group,
[11] School Shooting Exercise Plan,
pp. 12-19
[12] Vivian Lee, Sofia Smallstorm,
James Tracy, and Jim Fetzer, Top Ten Reasons: Sandy Hook was an
Elaborate Hoax, January 7, 2014,
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/01/07/top-ten-reasons-sandy-hook-was-an-elaborate-hoax;
accessed 1/14/2014
[13] Vivian Lee, Sofia Smallstorm,
James Tracy, and Jim Fetzer, Top Ten Reasons: Sandy Hook was an
Elaborate Hoax, January 7, 2014,
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/01/07/top-ten-reasons-sandy-hook-was-an-elaborate-hoax;
accessed 1/14/2014
[14] Stephanie Sledge, The Government
Rag, January 26, 2013,
http://thegovernmentrag.wordpress.com/2013/01/26/the-motive-at-newtown,
accessed 1/20/2014
[15] Vivian Lee, Sofia Smallstorm,
James Tracy, and Jim Fetzer, Top Ten Reasons: Sandy Hook was an
Elaborate Hoax, January 7, 2014,
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/01/07/top-ten-reasons-sandy-hook-was-an-elaborate-hoax;
accessed 1/14/2014
[16] Vivian Lee, Sofia Smallstorm,
James Tracy, and Jim Fetzer, Top Ten Reasons: Sandy Hook was an
Elaborate Hoax, January 7, 2014,
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/01/07/top-ten-reasons-sandy-hook-was-an-elaborate-hoax;
accessed 1/14/2014
[17] Vivian Lee, Sofia Smallstorm,
James Tracy, and Jim Fetzer, Top Ten Reasons: Sandy Hook was an
Elaborate Hoax, January 7, 2014,
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/01/07/top-ten-reasons-sandy-hook-was-an-elaborate-hoax;
accessed 1/14/2014
[18] Vivian Lee, Sofia Smallstorm,
James Tracy, and Jim Fetzer, Top Ten Reasons: Sandy Hook was an
Elaborate Hoax, January 7, 2014,
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/01/07/top-ten-reasons-sandy-hook-was-an-elaborate-hoax;
accessed 1/14/2014
[19] Journal of the Bizarre, Was
Sandy Hook a Hoax? Part 1, January 23, 2013,
http://journalofthebizarre.blogspot.com/2013/01/was-sandy-hook-hoax-part-1.html